Infor — WMS vs Manhattan Associates

See Infor — WMS and Manhattan Associates side by side, based on capabilities documented in public sources. The table does not score or rank.

Category: Global WMS and supply chain software

Summary

Infor — WMSManhattan Associates
DeploymentCloudCloud
Documented capabilities179
Documented only here113
CompanyFounded 2002 · New York, USAFounded 1990 · Atlanta, USA

Shared capabilities: 6/20

Capabilities

CapabilitiesInfor — WMSManhattan Associates
3D warehouse / digital twin✓—
3PL billing✓—
Automation integration✓✓
Counting✓—
Cross-docking✓—
Goods receipt✓✓
Inventory / location management—✓
Kitting / value-added services✓—
Labour management✓✓
Multi-client (3PL)✓—
Packing✓—
Picking✓✓
Putaway✓✓
Replenishment✓—
Reporting / KPIs✓—
Shipping✓✓
Slotting—✓
Voice picking✓—
Wave / batch picking✓—
Yard / dock management—✓

“✓” means we found it in sources, “—” means we did not. A “—” does not mean the capability is unavailable.

This table is not the decision

This page shows what two solutions state in public sources; it does not show which one will work better in your warehouse. Decide with a demo scenario, reference calls and total cost.

Open this pair in the table Finder based on your requirements TCO calculator Talk to an expert

Sources

Infor — WMS profile

  1. www.infor.com/solutions/scm/warehouse-management-system
  2. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infor

Manhattan Associates profile

  1. www.manh.com/solutions/supply-chain-management-software/warehouse-management
  2. www.manh.com/solutions/supply-chain-management-software/activewarehouse
  3. www.manh.com/about-us/our-story-and-timeline

Checked: 2026-09-18

Other comparisons for these solutions